"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."
Cureus is on a mission to change the long-standing paradigm of medical publishing, where submitting research can be costly, complex and time-consuming.
The SIQ for this article will be revealed
industrial injury, exogenous, endophthalmitis, panophthalmitis, pasteurella multocida
Huei Xian Chai , Yi Ni Koh, Amir Samsudin, Mei Fong Chong
Cite this article as: Chai H, Koh Y, Samsudin A, et al. (April 08, 2022) Pasteurella Multocida Panophthalmitis: A Devastating Sequela of an Industrial Penetrating Injury. Cureus 14(4): e23962. doi:10.7759/cureus.23962
Pasteurella multocida is a rare but aggressive causative organism in panophthalmitis. It is commonly transmitted to humans through contact with cats and dogs as a result of bites or scratches. We report a rare case of panophthalmitis due to P. multocida following an industrial penetrating injury.
A previously healthy 40-year-old steel factory operator developed a right eye penetrating injury after being struck accidentally by a piece of iron wire which flew into his eye during work. He complained of immediate blurring of vision and severe pain in the affected eye. During history taking, he mentioned that many stray cats wandered around his workplace, although he had no direct contact with these animals. On examination, the best-corrected visual acuity was light perception in the right eye. Slit-lamp biomicroscopy revealed injected conjunctiva and a full-thickness macerated corneal laceration wound. The anterior chamber appeared shallow with the presence of lens matter. He was treated promptly with surgical repair along with intracameral and intravenous antibiotics for six hours post-trauma. His eye condition, however, deteriorated postoperatively despite aggressive treatment with further topical, intravitreal, and systemic antibiotics.
This is the first reported case of ocular P. multocida panophthalmitis secondary to industrial penetrating injury. Our case highlights the rapidly progressive nature of P. multocida infection. It should always be considered due to the very serious nature of infection as well as its resistance to standard antibiotic treatment regimens.
Pasteurella multocida is an uncommon causative pathogen in panophthalmitis, but it can cause devastating destruction of ocular tissue. It is a gram-negative coccobacillus, often co-existing as commensal in the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts of domestic and wild animals, particularly cats and dogs. It is usually transmitted to humans through contact with animals as a result of bites or scratches. We report a rare case of panophthalmitis due to P. multocida in this study following an industrial penetrating injury.
This article was previously presented as a poster at the 35th Singapore-Malaysia Joint Meeting in Ophthalmology from January 17 to 19, 2020.
A 40-year old gentleman who had no pre-existing medical illnesses presented to our eye clinic with a right eye penetrating injury, which occurred at his workplace on the same day of presentation. He worked as an operator in a steel manufacturing factory, where a piece of iron wire snapped off from an autowelding machine and struck him in the eye. At the time of injury, he was not wearing any eye protection. There was an immediate reduction in vision and severe pain in that right eye. During history taking, he mentioned that many stray cats wandered around his workplace, although he had no recent direct contact with them. Examination revealed best-corrected visual acuity of light perception, injected conjunctiva, and a full-thickness, 4-mm oblique macerated corneal laceration wound. The anterior chamber was shallow, with the presence of lens matter. The posterior segment could not be visualized. He was treated promptly with topical ciprofloxacin every two hours and intravenous ciprofloxacin 400 mg twice a day. The orbital x-ray did not show any intraocular foreign bodies. Lens aspiration, corneal suturing, and intracameral moxifloxacin injection were performed six hours post-injury. Intraoperatively, extensive posterior synechiae with fibrin were found in the anterior chamber. No foreign body was detected in the eye.
The patient’s eye started deteriorating on postoperative day three. Ocular motility was restricted in all directions of gaze. There was progressive eyelid swelling with severely chemosed conjunctiva and infiltration over the central cornea. The anterior chamber was filled with fibrin and hypopyon, and the fundus could not be visualized (Figure 1). B-scan ultrasonography showed vitreous opacities with multiple loculations in the posterior chamber (Figure 2). Computed tomography of the orbit revealed ill-defined hyperdense lesions within the right globe, with irregular septation (Figure 3). A diagnosis of exogenous panophthalmitis was made, and the patient was treated with intensive antimicrobial agents including topical ceftazidime 5% and topical gentamycin 1.4% hourly as well as intravenous ciprofloxacin 400 mg twice a day.
The systemic antibiotic was escalated to ceftriaxone 1 g daily and metronidazole 500 mg three times a day on day five of illness when the eye condition did not improve. Intravitreal taps were taken, and four doses of intravitreal antibiotic injections of 2 mg in 0.1 ml ceftazidime and 1 mg in 0.1 ml vancomycin were given throughout his admission. Aqueous and vitreous humor cultures both revealed the growth of P. multocida. Unfortunately, despite intensive antimicrobial therapy, the resolution of panophthalmitis was poor and the visual acuity ended up being no perception of light.
P. multocida is a non-motile gram-negative coccobacillus and exists as a commensal in the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts of many domestic and wild animals. Cats and dogs have the highest carriage rates at 70%-90% and 20%-50%, respectively [1]. Pasteurella infection is rare but potentially sight-threatening. In humans, it is commonly caused by dog and cat bites or scratches, followed by acute onset of localized soft tissue inflammation and purulent discharge within hours. Previous reports have stated that ocular P. multocida infections display a wide spectrum of clinical presentations and severity, including conjunctivitis, corneal ulcers, anterior uveitis, corneal abscesses, and endophthalmitis [2]. Panophthalmitis is one of the most serious ocular complications reported from P. multocida infection. Other systemic involvements are respiratory tract infections, meningitis, peritonitis, endocarditis, sepsis, and bone and joint infections [3]. P. multocida infection without animal bites can occur, which are usually found in the patient with severe comorbidities, immune-compromised states, bacteremia, and the need for intensive care unit management [1]. It is always associated with significant mortality.
Over the years, P. multocida-induced panophthalmitis has rarely been reported in the literature. This organism is not a common pathogen causing panophthalmitis following open globe injury, especially when it is not associated with animal bites or scratches. Previous reports have only described systemic and localized P. multocida human infection involving eyes with or without evident connections with animals [2,4,5-7]. To our best knowledge, this is the first reported case of ocular P. multocida panophthalmitis secondary to an industrial injury. Most of the cases demonstrated poor ocular outcomes [4,5,8]. However, there have been cases that had ended with good visual outcomes after timely and appropriate management [9,10]. Mochizuki et al. reported a case of a 10-year-old girl with P. multocida endophthalmitis caused by a perforating ocular injury after a cat scratch where vision recovered to 20/20 [9]. The initial vision of 20/40 and early vitrectomy surgery for the patient might probably be contributing factors toward her good visual outcome in her case.
Culture and sensitivity in the setting of exogenous panophthalmitis help in the detection of pathogenic organisms, and it provides valuable information to guide the selection of the most appropriate antibiotics to be used. The treatment of choice for P. multocida infections has typically been with beta-lactam penicillin, second and third-generation cephalosporins, carbapenem, fluoroquinolones, and tetracyclines [11]. Awareness of the potential pathogens, early and specific antibiotic selection, with appropriate emergency treatment are the gold standards of treatment.
Our case demonstrated the rapidly devastating ocular consequence of P. multocida infection in a healthy young gentleman, without a history of animal bites. In our case, the organism was most likely directly inoculated inside the globe via the steel wire that had previously come into contact with stray cats. Therefore, an ocular injury with either direct or indirect exposure to an animal such as a cat or a dog should bring the clinician’s attention to P. multocida. The patient was treated with high-dose intravenous ceftriaxone that was adjusted according to culture and sensitivity tests along with topical ceftazidime, gentamycin, and moxifloxacin. However, despite the aggressive treatment with topical, intravitreal, and systemic antibiotics, as well as prompt surgical repair, he still had a poor visual outcome.
Industrial injury has become a norm in daily ophthalmic practice. Most of these are potentially preventable. Omar et al. reported that the majority (54.4%) of open globe injuries in Hospital Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia, were comprised of workplace injuries [12]. This case highlights the detrimental impact of industrial injury in increasing the societal burden. Preventive measures such as raising awareness of occupational safety, enforcement of workplace safety rules, and effective training programs are recommended to reduce the incidence of industrial injuries.
P. multocida is a rare but aggressive causative organism in panophthalmitis. A literature review has highlighted the rapidly advancing and devastating outcome of ocular infection with this organism. Thus, it should always be considered as a potential causative pathogen for ocular infection, even in the absence of direct animal exposure.
Ophthalmology, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Selangor, MYS
Ophthalmology, Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Perak, MYS
Ophthalmology, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Selangor, MYS
Ophthalmology, Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Perak, MYS
Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
We would like to thank the Director-General of Health, Malaysia, for his permission to publish this article. The authors declare that there were no conflicts of interest or relevant funding for this case report.
Chai H, Koh Y, Samsudin A, et al. (April 08, 2022) Pasteurella Multocida Panophthalmitis: A Devastating Sequela of an Industrial Penetrating Injury. Cureus 14(4): e23962. doi:10.7759/cureus.23962
Peer review began: March 26, 2022 Peer review concluded: April 02, 2022 Published: April 08, 2022
© Copyright 2022 Chai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. Learn more here.
This link will take you to a third party website that is not affiliated with Cureus, Inc. Please note that Cureus is not responsible for any content or activities contained within our partner or affiliate websites.
Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. SIQ™ assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. All registered users are invited to contribute to the SIQ™ of any published article. (Authors cannot rate their own articles.)
High ratings should be reserved for work that is truly groundbreaking in its respective field. Anything above 5 should be considered above average. While all registered Cureus users can rate any published article, the opinion of domain experts is weighted appreciably more than that of non-specialists. An article’s SIQ™ will appear alongside the article after being rated twice and is recalculated with each additional rating.
Visit our SIQ™ page to find out more.
Scholarly Impact Quotient™ (SIQ™) is our unique post-publication peer review rating process. SIQ™ assesses article importance and quality by embracing the collective intelligence of the Cureus community-at-large. All registered users are invited to contribute to the SIQ™ of any published article. (Authors cannot rate their own articles.)
Already have an account? Sign in.
Please note that by doing so you agree to be added to our monthly email newsletter distribution list.
By joining Cureus, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.